[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: Get rid of superfluous call to pci_disable_msi()
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Alexander Gordeev <> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 05:31:43PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> I haven't put these in my branch, so you can take them.
>> Alexander has a whole batch of network driver updates that I think David
>> Miller is going to apply; would it make sense to include these in that
>> batch?
>> There's also the wil6210 patch for
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/pcie_bus.c, which seems like it maybe
>> could be in that batch, too.
> Well, as this series is small I thought it could quickly go thru your
> tree. But since ipr had conflicts, there is no point routing all patches
> altogether, so up to you guys. The wil6210 patch is already in your pci/msi
> branch though.

It's in pci/msi, but that's not in my -next branch yet, so I can
easily drop it. Do drivers/net/wireless patches normally follow a
different path than the other drivers/net patches? The wil6210 and
ath10k patches look just like the others in the 34-patch series (bnx2,
bnx2x, tg3, bna, cxgb3, etc.), so I thought it would make more sense
to include them there.

I think I need to put the ahci regression fix in v3.14, so I'll move
that to my for-linus branch and just keep the other odds and ends
(ahci and vfio) for v3.15.


 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-12 21:01    [W:0.089 / U:8.428 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site