| Date | Wed, 12 Feb 2014 11:49:10 -0700 | From | Shuah Khan <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3.13 000/120] 3.13.3-stable review |
| |
On 02/11/2014 12:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > Some -stable releases spring out from my build system bright and shiny > and ready to go. Not so with these releases. Maybe it's the horrid > weather that was happening during the creation of these kernels, or > something else, but whatever it was, they came into this world > screaming, kicking, killing build servers left-and-right, and breaking > the build every other patch. Some developers decided to get into the > act, constantly pushing the boundaries of what is an acceptable -stable > patch, and trying to skirt the rules of upstream patches first numerous > times, making me even grumpier than normal, "forcing" me to relax and > take in an afternoon playing of the Lego movie... > > Test these out well, they have barely survived my systems, and I don't > trust them in the slightest to not eat your disks, reap your tasks, and > run away laughing as your CPU turns into a space heater. > > You have been warned. > > ----------------- >
Worked fine on all my test systems. Compile tests and boot tests passed. No dmesg regressions: emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn.
-- Shuah
-- Shuah Khan Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley) shuah.kh@samsung.com | (970) 672-0658
|