lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 3.13 000/120] 3.13.3-stable review
    On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 08:29:06PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
    > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:04:01AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
    > > Some -stable releases spring out from my build system bright and shiny
    > > and ready to go. Not so with these releases. Maybe it's the horrid
    > > weather that was happening during the creation of these kernels, or
    > > something else, but whatever it was, they came into this world
    > > screaming, kicking, killing build servers left-and-right, and breaking
    > > the build every other patch. Some developers decided to get into the
    > > act, constantly pushing the boundaries of what is an acceptable -stable
    > > patch, and trying to skirt the rules of upstream patches first numerous
    > > times, making me even grumpier than normal, "forcing" me to relax and
    > > take in an afternoon playing of the Lego movie...
    > >
    > Come on, compared to me you are never grumpy.
    >
    > > Test these out well, they have barely survived my systems, and I don't
    > > trust them in the slightest to not eat your disks, reap your tasks, and
    > > run away laughing as your CPU turns into a space heater.
    > >
    > > You have been warned.
    > >
    > Hmm ... not sure if I want to take that risk :-). Going to be fun.
    > And looking for volunteers to provide me with a really great test suite
    > which I can run in qemu (and which doesn't take me days to set up).

    What about the new rcu test suite that has been added to the kernel
    tree?

    > > -----------------
    > >
    > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.13.3 release.
    > > There are 120 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
    > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
    > > let me know.
    > >
    > > Responses should be made by Thu Feb 13 18:47:55 UTC 2014.
    > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
    > >
    >
    > Build results:
    > total: 126 pass: 122 skipped: 4 fail: 0
    >
    > qemu tests all passed.
    >
    > Results are as expected (even though that may be unexpected in this case ;-).

    Yeah, it lives! Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.

    greg k-h


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2014-02-12 20:41    [W:2.791 / U:0.120 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site