lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 00/21] pinctrl: mvebu: restructure and remove hardcoded addresses from Dove pinctrl
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 03:18:50AM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 01/30/2014 09:25 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 07:50:34PM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> >>On 01/30/2014 07:29 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 01:39:12AM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> >>>>This patch set is one required step for Dove to hop into mach-mvebu.
> >>>>Until now, pinctrl-dove was hardcoding some registers that do not
> >>>>directly belong to MPP core registers. This is not compatible with
> >>>>what we want for mach-mvebu.
> >>>
> >>>I think there might be something wrong here....
> >>
> >>There _is_ something wrong. I'll have a look at it. For the record,
> >>what SoC are you testing with? From the base address, I guess it is
> >>Kirkwood?
> >
> >Yes, Kirkwood. Sorry for not saying.
>
> This time I push a branch before sending out the patches. Also, I
> think I'll postpone removal of hardcoded addresses until this is
> sorted out. The patch set was growing way to quick and I have to
> do this step-by-step for me and everybody else to actually understand ;)
>
> So, at least the MVEBU guys should test the following branch on
> their SoCs. Again, I have tested Dove and now confirmed that settings
> are still correct. The others are compile-tested.
>
> https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git unstable/mvebu-pinctrl-v3.14_v3

Hi Sebastian

Tested on Kirkwood. /debug/pinctrl is now identical with and without
the patch.

I've not looked at the actual patches, but please add a

Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>

Andrew


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-01 12:21    [W:0.123 / U:0.580 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site