lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Dec]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the bcm2835 tree with the arm-soc tree
Date
On Monday 08 December 2014 13:00:09 Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Dec 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > On Monday 08 December 2014 12:06:19 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Stephen,
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the bcm2835 tree got a conflict in
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile between commit 302a5ef29d49 ("ARM: BCM5301X:
> > > Add DT for Netgear R6300 V2") from the arm-soc tree and commit
> > > 6298ed17a404 ("ARM: bcm2835: Add device tree for Raspberry Pi model
> > > B+") from the bcm2835 tree.
> > >
> > > I fixed it up (the bcm2835 tree patch is also in the arm-soc tree as
> > > commit ba2a1d6959ac ("ARM: bcm2835: Add device tree for Raspberry Pi
> > > model B+"), so I just used the arm-soc version) and can carry the fix
> > > as necessary (no action is required).
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the notification!
> >
> > Lee, do you know what is going on? Did you accidentally rebase a commit
> > that you already sent for inclusion in arm-soc?
>
> Nope. The branch hasn't changed at all.
>
> OOI why would a re-base affect anything? I sent you it in patch form.

Ah, I looked at the wrong branch and didn't see that I applied a patch
instead of a pull request. It's all fine then, as long as you never
intend to send any pull requests based on top of your current branch.

You can possibly make Stephen's life a tiny bit simpler if you just
drop all patches from your for-next branch as soon as we've picked
them up into arm-soc.

Arnd


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-12-08 15:01    [W:0.043 / U:0.796 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site