lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Dec]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] clk: samsung: Use samsung_cmu_register_one() to simplify code
From
Hi Sylwester,

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki
<s.nawrocki@samsung.com> wrote:
> Hi Chanwoo,
>
> On 23/12/14 08:40, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> This patch-set uses the samsung_cmu_register_one() function to simplify the
>> clock driver for Exynos3250/Exynos4415 SoC and change return value of
>> samsung_cmu_register_one() because some clock driver may need the instance
>> of samsung_clk_provider structure.
>>
>> Chanwoo Choi (3):
>> clk: samsung: Changes the return value of samsung_cmu_register_one()
>> clk: samsung: exynos3250: Use samsung_cmu_register_one() to simplify code
>> clk: samsung: exynos4415: Use samsung_cmu_register_one() to simplify code
>>
>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos3250.c | 217 ++++++++---------------------------
>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4415.c | 216 ++++++++--------------------------
>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c | 13 ++-
>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h | 3 +-
>> 4 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 342 deletions(-)
>
> Thanks for the cleanup, I've queued that for 3.20. And fixed a minor
> checkpatch warning when applying:
>
> ERROR: "foo* __init bar" should be "foo * __init bar"
> #29: FILE: drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c:377:
> +struct samsung_clk_provider* __init samsung_cmu_register_one(
>
> total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 42 lines checked
>
> 0001-clk-samsung-Changes-the-return-value-of-samsung_cmu_.patch has style
> problems, please review.

I'll fix it and re-send these patch-set.

Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-12-23 16:41    [W:0.054 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site