lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 00/14] nfsd/sunrpc: add support for a workqueue-based nfsd
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 02:18:14PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
...
> unbound. If strict cpu locality is likely to be beneficial and each
> work item isn't likely to consume huge amount of cpu cycles,
> WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE would fit better; otherwise, WQ_UNBOUND to let the
> scheduler do its thing.

Hmmm... but you're already using WQ_UNBOUND. Concurrency management
doesn't matter for unbound workqueues. They really just behave as
shared worker thread pools. Does turning on WQ_HIGHPRI change
anything? Workqueue always prefers hot workers which can lead to the
hot ones being penalized for consuming too much CPU time.

Thanks.

--
tejun


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-12-02 21:02    [W:0.147 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site