Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: introduce sendfd() syscall | From | Eric Dumazet <> | Date | Tue, 02 Dec 2014 08:42:54 -0800 |
| |
On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 03:23 +1100, Alex Dubov wrote:
> Same as SIGKILL. And yet, our machines are still working fine. > > If process A has sufficient capability to send signals to process B, > then process B is already at its mercy, fds or not fds.
Tell me how a 128 threads program can use this new mechanism in a scalable way.
One signal per thread ?
I guess we'll keep AF_UNIX then, thank you.
| |