On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 03:31:05PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > looks like we could also sanitize the perf_ftrace_function_call > in the same way.. like below (untested) > > hum, I just noticed it actually has pt_regs arg ;-)
Bu if it has pt_regs should we not use that instead of filling one out again?