Messages in this thread | | | From | Andy Lutomirski <> | Date | Sun, 14 Dec 2014 09:41:04 -0800 | Subject | Re: linux-next: question about the luto-misc tree |
| |
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 08:29:33AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 4:03 AM, Paul E. McKenney >> <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> > On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 11:26:36PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> >> On Dec 13, 2014 10:58 PM, "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Hi Andy, >> >> > >> >> > The luto-misc tree seems to have a whole series of commits in it that >> >> > have just bee removed from the rcu tree ... You really have to be very >> >> > careful if you base your work on a tree that is regularly rebased. >> >> >> >> Hmm. They were there a couple days ago. Paul, what should I do about >> >> this? I only need the one NMI nesting change for the stuff in >> >> luto/next. >> >> >> >> > I also wonder if the other commits in that tree are destined for >> >> > v3.19? If they are for v3.20, then they should not be in linux-next >> >> > until after v3.19-rc1 has been released. >> >> >> >> They're for 3.20. I'll drop the whole series from the next branch for now. >> > >> > You mean the NMI nesting change below, correct? One approach would be >> > to include the branch rcu/dev from my -rcu tree. Would that work for you? >> >> That would work. >> >> The problem is that, if you rebase again and I don't notice, then >> it'll generate a pile of conflicts. Is there someway that I can flag >> my next tree as depending on a certain commi existing in another tree >> so that the scripts that generate linux-next will ignore it if the >> base commit goes away? > > The commits would still stick around because I keep date-encoded branches. > But just to make things easier, I created a andy.2014.11.21a branch that > points to the current commit and will stay there. Please let me know how > it goes. >
That's the same commit that's in rcu/dev and was in luto/next, I think. Is the issue just that you pulled the whole thing from whichever linux-rcu branch is in -next, but I still had it, so it caused a problem?
In any case, I'll wait for 3.19-rc1 before re-adding any of this.
--Andy
> Thanx, Paul >
-- Andy Lutomirski AMA Capital Management, LLC
| |