Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:22:15 -0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] x86, traps: Track entry into and exit from IST context | From | Tony Luck <> |
| |
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 03:52:10PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> Dunno. Tony and Borislav -- when do you want the IST stack switching >> stuff? > > I'd leave that up to Tony and his testbench. I mean, we can hammer on > it as much as we can and it can pass all testing locally but the real > fun starts once it hits upstream and for that it doesn't matter which > release... IMHO.
So what was the net result of all the mode/RCU discussions?
Do I need some extra magic incantations in the final version of do_machine_check() beyond what was in this patch:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/546d169211835aded@agluck-desk.sc.intel.com
to make everything happy?
-Tony
| |