lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] virtio_ccw: minor enhancements
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 20:50:35 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 06:27:53PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 15:53:32 +0200
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Two enhancements for virtio_ccw, on top of latest 1.0 patchset
> > >
> > > Cornelia Huck (1):
> > > virtio_ccw: finalize_features error handling
> > >
> > > Michael S. Tsirkin (1):
> > > virtio_ccw: future-proof finalize_features
> > >
> > > drivers/s390/kvm/virtio_ccw.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
> > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >
> >
> > I tried to run this as a guest kernel with my virtio-1 qemu branch +
> > your revision patch on top and it at least boots :) More testing
> > tomorrow.
>
> It's best if you pick my tree from git.
> vhost-next branch.
>

FWIW: Your current vhost-next branch + my qemu with the known bugs
seems to hold up well so far; the endianness swap does not seem to
cause a noticeable performance hit (the problems come from my qemu code
dropping feature bits...)

Take this with a grain of salt as current qemu virtio-1 has known
problems, but I don't think there are major reasons speaking against
inclusion. At least, I don't think there's anything in there we can't
easily fix up later.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-12-10 19:21    [W:0.031 / U:0.380 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site