Messages in this thread | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] ptrace: add generic SET_SYSCALL request | Date | Fri, 07 Nov 2014 15:30:52 +0100 |
| |
On Friday 07 November 2014 13:11:30 Will Deacon wrote: > > > It's not that I care strongly about the interface, my main point is > > that the changelog doesn't describe why one interface was used instead > > the other. > > I suspect the current approach was taken because it follows the same scheme > as 32-bit ARM. If both methods are sufficient (Kees would have a better idea > than me on that), then I don't have a strong preference.
Using the regset would probably address Oleg's comment, and would keep the implementation architecture specific. You could even share the NT_S390_SYSTEM_CALL number, but I don't know if there any downsides to doing that.
Arnd
| |