Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | "pang.xunlei" <> | Subject | [PATCH 3/3] sched/rt: Optimize select_task_rq_rt() for non-RT curr task | Date | Mon, 3 Nov 2014 18:30:20 +0800 |
| |
When selecting the cpu for a waking RT task, if curr is a non-RT task which is bound only on this cpu, then we can give it a chance to select a different cpu(definitely an idle cpu if existing) for the RT task to avoid curr starving.
Signed-off-by: pang.xunlei <pang.xunlei@linaro.org> --- kernel/sched/rt.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c index d024e6c..89202ab 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c @@ -1319,6 +1319,11 @@ select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int sd_flag, int flags) * runqueue. Otherwise simply start this RT task * on its current runqueue. * + * If the current task on @p's runqueue is a non-RT task, + * and this task is bound on current runqueue, then try to + * see if we can wake this RT task up on a different runqueue, + * we will definitely find an idle cpu if there is any. + * * We want to avoid overloading runqueues. If the woken * task is a higher priority, then it will stay on this CPU * and the lower prio task should be moved to another CPU. @@ -1335,9 +1340,8 @@ select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int sd_flag, int flags) * This test is optimistic, if we get it wrong the load-balancer * will have to sort it out. */ - if (curr && unlikely(rt_task(curr)) && - (curr->nr_cpus_allowed < 2 || - curr->prio <= p->prio)) { + if (curr && unlikely(curr->nr_cpus_allowed < 2 || + curr->prio <= p->prio)) { int target = find_lowest_rq(p); if (target != -1) -- 1.7.9.5
| |