Messages in this thread | | | From | David Laight <> | Subject | RE: [RFC 0/2] Reenable might_sleep() checks for might_fault() when atomic | Date | Thu, 27 Nov 2014 15:37:28 +0000 |
| |
From: David Hildenbrand ... > Although it might not be optimal, but keeping a separate counter for > pagefault_disable() as part of the preemption counter seems to be the only > doable thing right now. I am not sure if a completely separated counter is even > possible, increasing the size of thread_info.
What about adding (say) 0x10000 for the more restrictive test?
David
| |