Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:41:43 +0800 | From | Jason Wang <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next] tun/macvtap: use consume_skb() instead of kfree_skb() in tun/macvtap_do_read() |
| |
On 11/26/2014 02:26 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 14:08 +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> To be more friendly with drop monitor, we should use comsume_skb() instead >> of kfree_skb() in tun/macvtap_do_read(). Otherwise, the packets will be >> marked as dropped. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> >> --- >> drivers/net/macvtap.c | 2 +- >> drivers/net/tun.c | 2 +- >> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/macvtap.c b/drivers/net/macvtap.c >> index 42a80d3..74d1b23 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/macvtap.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/macvtap.c >> @@ -862,7 +862,7 @@ static ssize_t macvtap_do_read(struct macvtap_queue *q, >> } >> iov_iter_init(&iter, READ, iv, segs, len); >> ret = macvtap_put_user(q, skb, &iter); >> - kfree_skb(skb); >> + consume_skb(skb); >> break; >> } >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c >> index ac53a73..d7edeaf 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c >> @@ -1363,7 +1363,7 @@ static ssize_t tun_do_read(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile, >> >> iov_iter_init(&iter, READ, iv, segs, len); >> ret = tun_put_user(tun, tfile, skb, &iter); >> - kfree_skb(skb); >> + consume_skb(skb); >> >> return ret; >> } > > These patches keep going on, but they are wrong. > > If you care about drop monitor, then you want to not hide drops but > precisely report them. > > Surely tun_put_user() can return an error, and then packet _is_ dropped.
True, I miss this. Will post V2. Thanks
| |