Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 26 Nov 2014 13:49:57 +0100 | From | Daniel Lezcano <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4] clocksource: arch_timer: Allow the device tree to specify uninitialized timer registers |
| |
On 11/26/2014 01:48 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 13:30:58 schrieb Daniel Lezcano: >> On 11/26/2014 01:06 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote: >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 12:51:08 schrieb Daniel Lezcano: >>>> Hi Doug, Olof, >>>> >>>> IIUC, it sounds like this patch is needed from some other patches in >>>> arm-soc. Olof was proposing to take this patch through its tree to >>>> facilitate the integration. >>>> >>>> Olof, is it this patch you were worried about ? >>> >>> I think this is one of two patches in question. >>> >>> "clocksource: arch_timer: Fix code to use physical timers when requested" >>> [0] would be the second one. >>> >>> And the patch for arm-soc that Olof means would be "ARM: dts: rk3288: add >>> arm,cpu-registers-not-fw-configured" [1]. >> >> Ok, so IIUC, "clocksource: arch_timer: Fix code to use physical timers >> when requested" should go via arm's tree, right ? > > If I'm reading Olof's irc-comments from yesterday correctly, that is right and > the 3 patches should go in together: > > - "clocksource: arch_timer: Fix code to use physical timers > when requested" fixes the use of physical timers in general > - "clocksource: arch_timer: Allow the device tree to specify uninitialized > timer registers" allows this to be set from dt > - "ARM: dts: rk3288: add arm,cpu-registers-not-fw-configured" enables this on > rk3288
Ok, then I drop them from my tree and will let Olof to handle them.
Thanks !
-- Daniel
-- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
| |