lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: thunderbolt: Deletion of unnecessary checks before the function call "ring_free"
    From
    Date
    On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 15:14 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
    > >> 2. Are any additional prefixes appropriate so that further name space
    > >> conflicts can be better avoided?
    > >
    > > To avoid possible external naming conflicts, add tb_ prefix to
    > > various ring_<foo> structs and functions.
    >
    > Do you imagine that any XEN software developers need also to reconsider
    > this implementation detail?
    > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c?id=fc14f9c1272f62c3e8d01300f52467c0d9af50f9#n268

    I think static functions can be named whatever
    the developer chooses.




    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2014-11-23 17:01    [W:2.054 / U:0.056 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site