lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: task_stat splat
On 11/23, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 06:22:56PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > Could you identify somehow the line which matches
> > task_sched_runtime+0x99 ? Probably do_task_delta_exec()...
>
> See http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=141675498417759&w=2
>
> Chris triggers the same splat and reverting
>
> 6e998916dfe3 ("sched/cputime: Fix clock_nanosleep()/clock_gettime() inconsistency")
>
> fixes the issue for him. I'm testing that same thing reverted too, first
> resume cycle looks good.

Yes, this probably confirms the theory, stop_class needs update_curr.

Oleg.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-11-23 20:01    [W:0.036 / U:0.584 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site