Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:52:36 +0100 | From | David Sterba <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: ctree: reduce args where only fs_info used |
| |
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 01:03:32AM +0900, Daniel Dressler wrote: > No problem, I'll redo everything so it is one function per patch. Now > fair warning: there are about 102 functions to cleanup. I was a bit > worried that many patches would cause too much maintainer overhead but > it is no problem for me.
Yeah, I'm aware that it's all over the sources. I'd say send no more than 30 patches in a burst first and see how it'd work.
> Only a few functions have dependecies on > other functions needing cleanup. Thus there will be some small patch > series for those function sets. A big benefit of one function one > patch is that extent-io.c will no longer be a 34 function monster > patch. > > Is there any rate limiting I should be doing? I don't want to flood > the list with burst of dozen plus patches, or is that an okay volume?
Should be fine.
| |