Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Nov 2014 18:51:09 +0000 | From | Al Viro <> | Subject | Re: mlx5: don't duplicate kvfree() |
| |
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 07:09:31PM +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote: > On 11/20/2014 10:17 AM, Al Viro wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 08:13:57AM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > >>> 9 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) > >grr... 8 files changed, actually - that was from the diff that included mlx4 > >bits. Patch split correctly and sent in two pieces, summary left as is ;-/ > >Sorry about the confusion it might cause... > Al, > > I think the best way to proceed here is to come up with mlx4 and > mlx5 patches and get both of them in through netdev / net-nexttree, > don't worry about each of these drivers have a part which is also > under drivers/infiniband/hw -- it doesn't justify splitting in this > case
Both had been sent to netdev today (and ACKed by respective drivers' maintainers). I'd certainly prefer not to put them through vfs.git, but beyond that I really don't care which tree do those go into...
| |