lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] ACPI / GPIO: Driver GPIO mappings for ACPI GPIOs
    Date
    On Monday, November 17, 2014 01:28:54 PM Alexandre Courbot wrote:
    > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
    > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
    > >> On Monday, November 03, 2014 02:22:10 PM Linus Walleij wrote:
    > >
    > >>> With that change:
    > >>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
    > >>
    > >> OK, made the changes and added your Reviewed-by.
    > >>
    > >> One semi-related question though. Alexandre ACKed the patch before, so
    > >> what did that mean from the GPIO subsystem's perspective? Was the patch
    > >> approved, not approved, semi-approved?
    > >
    > > It just means we are not always entirely aligned, it's not like
    > > Alexandre and I have meetings on the side and decide what to
    > > say, it's just these mails. I do trust him, I wouldn't get mad if it
    > > had been merged just wanted some polishing when I could get
    > > it...
    >
    > In case of conflicting feedback between me and Linus, it goes without
    > saying that Linus' opinion should prevail. I am trying to help a bit
    > and take some of the burden off his shoulders, but have neither his
    > skill nor his experience (which shows when you compare our patch
    > reviews). So for important stuff it is a good idea to wait until both
    > of us give a ack - the most likely conflict scenario being that I give
    > a pass overlooking something that Linus will catch.

    Thanks for the clarification!

    Rafael



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2014-11-18 00:41    [W:2.996 / U:0.068 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site