Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Kamal Mostafa <> | Subject | [PATCH 3.13 139/163] drm/radeon/cik: use a separate counter for CP init timeout | Date | Thu, 9 Oct 2014 14:02:44 -0700 |
| |
3.13.11.9 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
commit 370ce45b5986118fa496dddbcd7039e1aa1a418f upstream.
Otherwise we may fail to init the second compute ring.
Noticed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c index 4c5828b..e54f8da 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c @@ -4327,7 +4327,7 @@ struct bonaire_mqd */ static int cik_cp_compute_resume(struct radeon_device *rdev) { - int r, i, idx; + int r, i, j, idx; u32 tmp; bool use_doorbell = true; u64 hqd_gpu_addr; @@ -4446,7 +4446,7 @@ static int cik_cp_compute_resume(struct radeon_device *rdev) mqd->queue_state.cp_hqd_pq_wptr= 0; if (RREG32(CP_HQD_ACTIVE) & 1) { WREG32(CP_HQD_DEQUEUE_REQUEST, 1); - for (i = 0; i < rdev->usec_timeout; i++) { + for (j = 0; j < rdev->usec_timeout; j++) { if (!(RREG32(CP_HQD_ACTIVE) & 1)) break; udelay(1); -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |