lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] arm: armv7: perf: fix armv7 ref-cycles error
On 2014/10/9 11:41, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:07:04AM +0800, zhangzhiqiang wrote:
>> On 2014/10/8 21:38, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 02:31:47PM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:17:41AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 04:06:12AM +0100, zhangzhiqiang wrote:
>>>>>> hi all,
>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ref-cycles event is specially to Intel core, but can still used in arm architecture
>>>>>> with the wrong return value with 3.10 stable. for instance:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> perf stat -e ref-cycles sleep 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1':
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 0 ref-cycles
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1.002381916 seconds time elapsed
>>>>>>
>>>>>> this patch fix the bug and make it return NOT SUPPORTED
>>>>>> distinctly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In upstream this bug has been fixed by other way(not primary for the bug), which changes more than one file
>>>>>> and more than 1000 lines. the primary commit is 6b7658ec8a100b608e59e3cde353434db51f5be0.
>>>>>> besides we can not simply cherry-pick.
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought I saw Greg pick this up the other day?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, it's in 3.16.4, did I do something wrong by accepting it?
>>>
>>> Nah, it's a trivial patch that I struggle to get excited about. I'm just not
>>> sure why it's being sent again, after you already accepted it.
>>
>> Yes, it's in 3.16.4, in my opinion 3.10 need it too, can we put it into 3.10 or
>> do we have the plan?
>
> Does it apply to 3.10-stable? Did you test it there and see if it
> resolves your issue?

I have tested in 3.10.56, the bug is still existing and the patch is apply to 3.10-stable.
Follow is the result without/with this patch based on 3.10.56.

3.10.56 without the patch:
bash-4.2# perf stat -e ref-cycles sleep 1

Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1':

0 ref-cycles

1.002461500 seconds time elapsed

3.10.56 with the patch:
bash-4.2# perf stat -e ref-cycles sleep 1

Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1':

<not supported> ref-cycles

1.002385243 seconds time elapsed

Best wishes,

zhangzhiqiang





\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-09 09:42    [W:0.075 / U:0.888 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site