Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 9 Oct 2014 00:45:41 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] regulator: of: Lower the severity of the error with no container |
| |
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 03:59:12PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> There is a log message "no parameters" for each regulator. This is printed > unconditionally from print_constraints().
> Looking through the code again, looks like this is on purpose. It is just a bit > annoying to get lots of those messages. One of the systems I am dealing with has > 17 LTC2978 chips in it, with 8 channels each. That results in 136 times "no > parameters" in the boot log. And that is not even a fully populated system; > if fully populated, there can be more than 60 of those chips. 500+ lines of > similar log messages is really a bit on the high side.
> It might help if there was a way to silence the messages, ie to make > "print_constraints" optional.
Ah, from the constraints rather than from the DT parsing. I do like having it there since it's enormously helpful in debugging and that is a... specialist number of regulators you have in your system. We can definitely at least add a boot argument or something to suppress them, let me have a think if we want to do that by default. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |