Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 8 Oct 2014 19:09:18 -0400 | Subject | Re: pinctrl-msm build error on Linus' tree | From | Josh Boyer <> |
| |
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org> wrote: > Hey Josh- > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 06:42:55PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> We're hitting a build error on ARM with Linus' tree as of Linux >> v3.17-2860-gef0625b70dac : >> >> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c: In function 'msm_pinctrl_setup_pm_reset': >> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c:875:4: error: implicit declaration >> of function 'register_restart_handler' >> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> if (register_restart_handler(&pctrl->restart_nb)) >> ^ >> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c: In function 'msm_pinctrl_remove': >> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c:949:2: error: implicit declaration >> of function 'unregister_restart_handler' >> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> unregister_restart_handler(&pctrl->restart_nb); >> ^ >> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors >> >> Looking at the git logs it seems this was added via: >> >> commit cf1fc187628913070c3e418ce0e205732435aa2f >> Author: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org> >> Date: Tue Sep 23 15:59:53 2014 -0500 >> >> pinctrl: qcom: use restart_notifier mechanism for ps_hold >> >> >> However, there is literally nothing else in the tree that calls or >> provides those functions: >> >> [jwboyer@vader linux]$ git grep unregister_restart_handler >> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c: unregister_restart_handler(&pctrl->resta >> [jwboyer@vader linux]$ >> >> >> I'm rather confused. How was this commit built and tested? > > This may be my fault for not clearly stating that this particular patch > was dependent on Guenter's restart notifier patchset. This patch was > applied to linusw's tree without these patches. Perhaps it should be > dropped for now until the restart_notifier stuff lands?
Thanks, that explains things. I'm not sure if Linus would do a revert at this point. I guess it depends on how fast he's going to merge Guenter's patches.
Is there a reason this wasn't all brought in via one tree? Seems like it should have been.
josh
| |