Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] Perf Bench: Locking Microbenchmark | From | Tuan Bui <> | Date | Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:14:53 -0700 |
| |
On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 21:57 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 14:12 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 07:28:32AM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu: > > > If you compare an strace of AIM7 steady state and 'perf bench > > > lock' steady state, is it comparable, i.e. do the syscalls and > > > > Isn't "lock" too generic? Isn't this stressing some specific lock and if > > so shouldn't that be made abundantly clear in the 'perf bench' test name > > and in the docs? > > yeah, and 'perf bench locking creat' just doesn't sound right. >
Do you have any suggestion on how i should name it?
| |