lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] Perf Bench: Locking Microbenchmark
From
Date
On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 21:57 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 14:12 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 07:28:32AM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> > > If you compare an strace of AIM7 steady state and 'perf bench
> > > lock' steady state, is it comparable, i.e. do the syscalls and
> >
> > Isn't "lock" too generic? Isn't this stressing some specific lock and if
> > so shouldn't that be made abundantly clear in the 'perf bench' test name
> > and in the docs?
>
> yeah, and 'perf bench locking creat' just doesn't sound right.
>

Do you have any suggestion on how i should name it?



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-09 00:41    [W:0.102 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site