Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 7 Oct 2014 13:07:33 +0200 | Subject | Re: [RFC] pinctrl driver for Zynq | From | Linus Walleij <> |
| |
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2014-09-25 at 10:17AM +0200, Steffen Trumtrar wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 02:09:14PM -0700, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
>> (...) >> >> > + pinctrl_sdio1_cd_54: pinctrl-sdio1_cd@54 { >> > + sdio1_cd-mux { >> > + function = "sdio1_cd"; >> > + pins = "sdio1_emio_cd_grp"; >> > + }; >> > + }; >> > + }; >> > }; >> > >> >> Wouldn't this reaaally bloat the dtb? >> I know that imx decided to remove all the pinctrls from the dtsis, because >> the dtbs got to big. > > Yep, it absolutely does and I don't really know what to do about it. > Listing them all is a lot. Not listing them all would force board DTs to > potentially duplicate such nodes. This is definitely one of the things > I'm seeking input on. > Is there any good solution or best practice?
What about the middle road just putting those that are actually used in some DTS file into the DTSI?
Else I vote for duplicating them in each DTS.
Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |