Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 05 Oct 2014 09:31:45 +0800 | From | Chen Gang <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] drivers: base: power: domain: Use 'pm_cpu_data' instead of 'cpu_data' for compiling break |
| |
On 10/5/14 9:13, Chen Gang wrote: > On 10/5/14 0:00, Greg KH wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 10:19:50PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: >>> 'cpu_data' is too common to be already used by some architectures (e.g. >>> um, m32r, and mn10300), so need use 'pm_cpu_data' instead of, or cause >>> compiling break. The related error (with allmodconfig under um): >>> >>> CC drivers/base/platform.o >>> In file included from ./arch/x86/um/asm/processor.h:31:0, >>> from ./arch/um/include/asm/uaccess.h:16, >>> from ./arch/um/include/asm/thread_info.h:13, >>> from include/linux/thread_info.h:54, >>> from include/asm-generic/current.h:4, >>> from arch/um/include/generated/asm/current.h:1, >>> from include/linux/mutex.h:13, >>> from include/linux/kernfs.h:13, >>> from include/linux/sysfs.h:15, >>> from include/linux/kobject.h:21, >>> from include/linux/device.h:17, >>> from include/linux/platform_device.h:14, >>> from drivers/base/platform.c:14: >>> ./arch/um/include/asm/processor-generic.h:107:19: error: expected identifier or '(' before '&' token >>> #define cpu_data (&boot_cpu_data) >>> ^ >>> include/linux/pm_domain.h:74:23: note: in expansion of macro 'cpu_data' >>> struct gpd_cpu_data *cpu_data; >>> ^ >>> >>> Also need notice about 80 columns boundary. >> >> I don't object to this change at all, but it could be easier to solve >> this by fixing up 'cpu_data' to be named something a bit less "generic"? >> What does x86 use for this data type? >> > > It is for some kinds of arm cpu (I let this patch pass arm s3c600
Oh, sorry, typo issue, it is s3c6400 def_config.
> def_config building). Other architectures did not use it, at present. > > If necessary to complete the comments, please let me know, I shall send > patch v2 for it. > > Thanks. >
-- Chen Gang
Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed
| |