lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 18/20] perf: Allocate ring buffers for inherited per-task kernel events
Em Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 09:43:59AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:44:54AM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> > Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:
> > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 04:45:46PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> > >> When a new event is inherited from a per-task kernel event that has a
> > >> ring buffer, allocate a new buffer for this event so that data from the
> > >> child task is collected and can later be retrieved for sample annotation
> > >> or core dump inclusion. This ring buffer is released when the event is
> > >> freed, for example, when the child task exits.

> > > This causes a pinned memory explosion, not at all nice that.

> > > I think I see why and all, but it would be ever so good to not have to
> > > allocate so much memory.

> > Are there any controls we could use to limit such memory usage?

> I'd say the same limit we're already accounting the mmap()s against. But
> the question is; what do we do when we run out?

> Will we fail clone()? That might 'surprise' quite a few people, that

> their application won't work when profiled.

Can't we just emit PERF_RECORD_THROTTLE or similar stuff then? I.e.
somehow mark the cloned process as not being profiled due to ENOMEM?

- Arnaldo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-30 15:01    [W:0.162 / U:0.592 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site