lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 18/20] perf: Allocate ring buffers for inherited per-task kernel events
Date
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:

> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:44:54AM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 04:45:46PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> >> Normally, per-task events can't be inherited parents' ring buffers to
>> >> avoid multiple events contending for the same buffer. And since buffer
>> >> allocation is typically done by the userspace consumer, there is no
>> >> practical interface to allocate new buffers for inherited counters.
>> >>
>> >> However, for kernel users we can allocate new buffers for inherited
>> >> events as soon as they are created (and also reap them on event
>> >> destruction). This pattern has a number of use cases, such as event
>> >> sample annotation and process core dump annotation.
>> >>
>> >> When a new event is inherited from a per-task kernel event that has a
>> >> ring buffer, allocate a new buffer for this event so that data from the
>> >> child task is collected and can later be retrieved for sample annotation
>> >> or core dump inclusion. This ring buffer is released when the event is
>> >> freed, for example, when the child task exits.
>> >>
>> >
>> > This causes a pinned memory explosion, not at all nice that.
>> >
>> > I think I see why and all, but it would be ever so good to not have to
>> > allocate so much memory.
>>
>> Are there any controls we could use to limit such memory usage?
>
> I'd say the same limit we're already accounting the mmap()s against. But
> the question is; what do we do when we run out?
>
> Will we fail clone()? That might 'surprise' quite a few people, that
> their application won't work when profiled.

Or we just don't allocate any more buffers for this user; if there's a
perf stream involved, we can output a record saying that.

> In any case, lets focus on the other parts of this work and delay this
> feature till later.

Agreed.

Regards,
--
Alex


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-30 12:01    [W:1.242 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site