Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | [PATCH 3.10 142/143] oom_kill: add rcu_read_lock() into find_lock_task_mm() | Date | Fri, 3 Oct 2014 14:35:37 -0700 |
| |
3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
commit 4d4048be8a93769350efa31d2482a038b7de73d0 upstream.
find_lock_task_mm() expects it is called under rcu or tasklist lock, but it seems that at least oom_unkillable_task()->task_in_mem_cgroup() and mem_cgroup_out_of_memory()->oom_badness() can call it lockless.
Perhaps we could fix the callers, but this patch simply adds rcu lock into find_lock_task_mm(). This also allows to simplify a bit one of its callers, oom_kill_process().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Sergey Dyasly <dserrg@gmail.com> Cc: Sameer Nanda <snanda@chromium.org> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org> Cc: "Ma, Xindong" <xindong.ma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: "Tu, Xiaobing" <xiaobing.tu@intel.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
--- mm/oom_kill.c | 12 ++++++++---- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c @@ -102,14 +102,19 @@ struct task_struct *find_lock_task_mm(st { struct task_struct *t; + rcu_read_lock(); + for_each_thread(p, t) { task_lock(t); if (likely(t->mm)) - return t; + goto found; task_unlock(t); } + t = NULL; +found: + rcu_read_unlock(); - return NULL; + return t; } /* return true if the task is not adequate as candidate victim task. */ @@ -461,10 +466,8 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct task_struct } read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); - rcu_read_lock(); p = find_lock_task_mm(victim); if (!p) { - rcu_read_unlock(); put_task_struct(victim); return; } else if (victim != p) { @@ -490,6 +493,7 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct task_struct * That thread will now get access to memory reserves since it has a * pending fatal signal. */ + rcu_read_lock(); for_each_process(p) if (p->mm == mm && !same_thread_group(p, victim) && !(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) {
| |