lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: e1000_netpoll(): disable_irq() triggers might_sleep() on linux-next
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 09:23:42PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> But at least it allows to mitigate the impact by making it conditional
> at a central point.
>
> static inline void netpoll_lock(struct net_device *nd)
> {
> if (netpoll_active(nd))
> spin_lock(&nd->netpoll_lock);
> }

branch fail vs lock might be a toss on most machines, but if we're
hitting cold cachelines we loose big.

> and let the core code make sure that activation/deactivation of
> netpoll on a particular interface is serialized against the interrupt
> and netpoll calls.
>
> Not sure if it's worth the trouble, but at least it allows to deal
> with it in the core instead of dealing with it on a per driver base.

Does multi-queue have one netdev per queue or does that need moar
logicz?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-29 22:01    [W:0.046 / U:1.296 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site