Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:16:57 +0100 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | [PATCH] netdev: Fix sleeping inside wait event |
| |
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:25:41PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > [ 122.247299] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 122.247328] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 61 at kernel/sched/core.c:7312 __might_sleep+0x50/0x249() > [ 122.247334] do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=2 set at [<c106ffd9>] prepare_to_wait+0x3c/0x5f > [ 122.247339] Modules linked in: > [ 122.247349] CPU: 0 PID: 61 Comm: kworker/u2:1 Not tainted 3.18.0-rc2-00037-g24574709 #136 > [ 122.247350] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 > [ 122.247368] Workqueue: netns cleanup_net > [ 122.247377] c1071d83 d2b83dd8 d2b83dac c15887b1 d2b83dc8 c104c4c6 00001c90 c1068ebf > [ 122.247383] 00000000 c17b67e3 0000026d d2b83de0 c104c508 00000009 d2b83dd8 c17b5d4b > [ 122.247388] d2b83df4 d2b83e0c c1068ebf c17b5cec 00001c90 c17b5d4b 00000002 c106ffd9 > [ 122.247389] Call Trace: > [ 122.247393] [<c1071d83>] ? down_trylock+0x23/0x2c > [ 122.247402] [<c15887b1>] dump_stack+0x16/0x18 > [ 122.247413] [<c104c4c6>] warn_slowpath_common+0x66/0x7d > [ 122.247416] [<c1068ebf>] ? __might_sleep+0x50/0x249 > [ 122.247419] [<c104c508>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x2b/0x2f > [ 122.247422] [<c1068ebf>] __might_sleep+0x50/0x249 > [ 122.247424] [<c106ffd9>] ? prepare_to_wait+0x3c/0x5f > [ 122.247426] [<c106ffd9>] ? prepare_to_wait+0x3c/0x5f > [ 122.247432] [<c158c364>] mutex_lock_nested+0x23/0x347 > [ 122.247436] [<c1075105>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd > [ 122.247439] [<c158eb0c>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x66/0x78 > [ 122.247445] [<c1570e10>] rtnl_lock+0x14/0x16 > [ 122.247449] [<c156516b>] default_device_exit_batch+0x54/0xf3 > [ 122.247452] [<c1570e1f>] ? rtnl_unlock+0xd/0xf > [ 122.247454] [<c1070233>] ? __wake_up_sync+0x12/0x12 > [ 122.247461] [<c155e35d>] ops_exit_list+0x20/0x40 > [ 122.247464] [<c155ec96>] cleanup_net+0xbe/0x140 > [ 122.247473] [<c105ffe4>] process_one_work+0x29e/0x643 > [ 122.247479] [<c1061215>] worker_thread+0x23a/0x311 > [ 122.247482] [<c1060fdb>] ? rescuer_thread+0x204/0x204 > [ 122.247486] [<c10648cc>] kthread+0xbe/0xc3 > [ 122.247490] [<c158f4c0>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x30 > [ 122.247492] [<c106480e>] ? kthread_stop+0x364/0x364 > [ 122.247495] ---[ end trace 2073c37ae3c8b3b4 ]---
Ah, more of that. Thanks!
Dave, this relies on bits currently in tip/sched/core, if you're ok I'll merge it through that tree.
--- Subject: netdev: Fix sleeping inside wait event From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Date: Wed Oct 29 17:04:56 CET 2014
rtnl_lock_unregistering() takes rtnl_lock() -- a mutex -- inside a wait loop. The wait loop relies on current->state to function, but so does mutex_lock(), nesting them makes for the inner to destroy the outer state.
Fix this using the new wait_woken() bits.
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> --- net/core/dev.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/net/core/dev.c +++ b/net/core/dev.c @@ -7196,11 +7196,10 @@ static void __net_exit rtnl_lock_unregis */ struct net *net; bool unregistering; - DEFINE_WAIT(wait); + DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function); + add_wait_queue(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait); for (;;) { - prepare_to_wait(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait, - TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); unregistering = false; rtnl_lock(); list_for_each_entry(net, net_list, exit_list) { @@ -7212,9 +7211,10 @@ static void __net_exit rtnl_lock_unregis if (!unregistering) break; __rtnl_unlock(); - schedule(); + + wait_woken(&wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT); } - finish_wait(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait); + remove_wait_queue(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait); } static void __net_exit default_device_exit_batch(struct list_head *net_list)
| |