Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:54:26 +0900 | From | Joonsoo Kim <> | Subject | Re: [RFC 0/4] [RFC] slub: Fastpath optimization (especially for RT) |
| |
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:02:18AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Fri, 24 Oct 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > In this case, object from cpu1's cpu_cache should be > > different with cpu0's, so allocation would be failed. > > That is true for most object pointers unless the value is NULL. Which it > can be. But if this is the only case then the second patch + your approach > would work too.
Indeed... I missed the null value case. Your second patch + mine would fix that situation, but, I need more thinking. :)
Thanks.
| |