Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 28 Oct 2014 00:25:22 +0100 | From | Alexander Graf <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] arm64: amd-seattle: Adding device tree for AMD Seattle platform |
| |
On 27.10.14 15:29, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote: > On 10/26/2014 9:08 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: >>>> This option doesn't exist in upstream kernels, does it? Why not just >>>> >>make it dtb-y? >>> > >>> >CONFIG_ARCH_SEATTLE is being added one hunk above.:) >> Oops:). >> >> I'm not convinced we need a config option just for the sake of >> compiling a device tree though. >> >> >> Alex >> > > Eventually, we would add other device driver selections when > CONFIG_ARCH_SEATTLE=y. At this point, those drivers are still not ready.
Could you please give me some examples of drivers that would depend on CONFIG_ARCH_SEATTLE? I like the current way things work without the need for such an option, where everything's implemented purely as drivers you can opt in our out of.
You don't have a CONFIG_ARCH_SB7XX on x86 either, right? ;)
Alex
| |