lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] arm64: amd-seattle: Adding device tree for AMD Seattle platform


    On 27.10.14 15:29, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote:
    > On 10/26/2014 9:08 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
    >>>> This option doesn't exist in upstream kernels, does it? Why not just
    >>>> >>make it dtb-y?
    >>> >
    >>> >CONFIG_ARCH_SEATTLE is being added one hunk above.:)
    >> Oops:).
    >>
    >> I'm not convinced we need a config option just for the sake of
    >> compiling a device tree though.
    >>
    >>
    >> Alex
    >>
    >
    > Eventually, we would add other device driver selections when
    > CONFIG_ARCH_SEATTLE=y. At this point, those drivers are still not ready.

    Could you please give me some examples of drivers that would depend on
    CONFIG_ARCH_SEATTLE? I like the current way things work without the need
    for such an option, where everything's implemented purely as drivers you
    can opt in our out of.

    You don't have a CONFIG_ARCH_SB7XX on x86 either, right? ;)


    Alex


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2014-10-28 01:01    [W:3.511 / U:0.284 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site