lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ipv6: notify userspace when we added or changed an ipv6 token
From
Date
On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 11:46 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 10/10/2014 04:08 PM, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> > NetworkManager might want to know that it changed when the router advertisement
> > arrives.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>
> > Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
> > Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> > index 3e118df..3d11390 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> > @@ -4528,6 +4528,7 @@ static int inet6_set_iftoken(struct inet6_dev *idev, struct in6_addr *token)
> > }
> >
> > write_unlock_bh(&idev->lock);
> > + netdev_state_change(dev);
>
> I'm wondering why netdev_state_change()? You are probably
> only after the netlink notification that is being invoked,
> i.e. rtmsg_ifinfo(RTM_NEWLINK, ...), and don't strictly want
> to call the device notifier chain.

Correct. I'll change it to just rtmsg_ifinfo().

> Perhaps it might be better to define a new RTM_SETTOKEN, and
> just call inet6_ifinfo_notify(RTM_SETTOKEN, idev) as this is
> only idev specific anyway?

I'm not really sure as that would require more userspace changes than
necessary.

> > addrconf_verify_rtnl();
> > return 0;
> > }
> >




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-26 23:41    [W:0.116 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site