Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 24 Oct 2014 18:08:22 +0300 | From | Dmitry Kasatkin <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ima: check xattr value length in ima_inode_setxattr() |
| |
On 24/10/14 18:00, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote: > On 24/10/14 17:18, Mimi Zohar wrote: >> On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 10:07 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote: >>> ima_inode_setxattr() can be called with no value. Function does not >>> check the length so that following command can be used to produce >>> kernel oops: setfattr -n security.ima FOO. This patch fixes it. >>> >>> Changes in v2: >>> * testing validity of xattr type >>> * allow setting hash only in fix or log mode (Mimi) >> I only mentioned "fix" mode, not "log" mode (explanation below). >> > We need it in log mode as well (explanation bellow) >>> [ 261.562522] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null) >>> [ 261.564109] IP: [<ffffffff812af272>] ima_inode_setxattr+0x3e/0x5a >>> [ 261.564109] PGD 3112f067 PUD 42965067 PMD 0 >>> [ 261.564109] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP >>> [ 261.564109] Modules linked in: bridge stp llc evdev serio_raw i2c_piix4 button fuse >>> [ 261.564109] CPU: 0 PID: 3299 Comm: setxattr Not tainted 3.16.0-kds+ #2924 >>> [ 261.564109] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 >>> [ 261.564109] task: ffff8800428c2430 ti: ffff880042be0000 task.ti: ffff880042be0000 >>> [ 261.564109] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff812af272>] [<ffffffff812af272>] ima_inode_setxattr+0x3e/0x5a >>> [ 261.564109] RSP: 0018:ffff880042be3d50 EFLAGS: 00010246 >>> [ 261.564109] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000015 >>> [ 261.564109] RDX: 0000001500000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8800375cc600 >>> [ 261.564109] RBP: ffff880042be3d68 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000004d6256 >>> [ 261.564109] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88002149ba00 >>> [ 261.564109] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 >>> [ 261.564109] FS: 00007f6c1e219740(0000) GS:ffff88005da00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 >>> [ 261.564109] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 >>> [ 261.564109] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 000000003b35a000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 >>> [ 261.564109] Stack: >>> [ 261.564109] ffff88002149ba00 ffff880042be3df8 0000000000000000 ffff880042be3d98 >>> [ 261.564109] ffffffff812a101b ffff88002149ba00 ffff880042be3df8 0000000000000000 >>> [ 261.564109] 0000000000000000 ffff880042be3de0 ffffffff8116d08a ffff880042be3dc8 >>> [ 261.564109] Call Trace: >>> [ 261.564109] [<ffffffff812a101b>] security_inode_setxattr+0x48/0x6a >>> [ 261.564109] [<ffffffff8116d08a>] vfs_setxattr+0x6b/0x9f >>> [ 261.564109] [<ffffffff8116d1e0>] setxattr+0x122/0x16c >>> [ 261.564109] [<ffffffff811687e8>] ? mnt_want_write+0x21/0x45 >>> [ 261.564109] [<ffffffff8114d011>] ? __sb_start_write+0x10f/0x143 >>> [ 261.564109] [<ffffffff811687e8>] ? mnt_want_write+0x21/0x45 >>> [ 261.564109] [<ffffffff811687c0>] ? __mnt_want_write+0x48/0x4f >>> [ 261.564109] [<ffffffff8116d3e6>] SyS_setxattr+0x6e/0xb0 >>> [ 261.564109] [<ffffffff81529da9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b >>> [ 261.564109] Code: 48 89 f7 48 c7 c6 58 36 81 81 53 31 db e8 73 27 04 00 85 c0 75 28 bf 15 00 00 00 e8 8a a5 d9 ff 84 c0 75 05 83 cb ff eb 15 31 f6 <41> 80 7d 00 03 49 8b 7c 24 68 40 0f 94 c6 e8 e1 f9 ff ff 89 d8 >>> [ 261.564109] RIP [<ffffffff812af272>] ima_inode_setxattr+0x3e/0x5a >>> [ 261.564109] RSP <ffff880042be3d50> >>> [ 261.564109] CR2: 0000000000000000 >>> [ 261.599998] ---[ end trace 39a89a3fc267e652 ]--- >>> >>> Reported-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> >>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com> >>> --- >>> security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 13 +++++++++++-- >>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c >>> index 9226854..e302cbf 100644 >>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c >>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c >>> @@ -378,8 +378,17 @@ int ima_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, >>> result = ima_protect_xattr(dentry, xattr_name, xattr_value, >>> xattr_value_len); >>> if (result == 1) { >>> - ima_reset_appraise_flags(dentry->d_inode, >>> - (xvalue->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG) ? 1 : 0); >>> + bool digsig; >>> + >>> + if (!xattr_value_len || >>> + (xvalue->type != IMA_XATTR_DIGEST && >>> + xvalue->type != IMA_XATTR_DIGEST_NG && >>> + xvalue->type != EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG)) >> "xvalue->type" is an enumerated type. Testing each possible value seems >> kind of a brittle method for vetting the value. I suggest testing the >> existing last value or, better yet, define a last value, so if someone >> adds or changes the order, nothing breaks. > I was considering to define _LAST value, but we have EVM_XATTR_HMAC in > the middle... > In fact I was expecting to get some feedback about it, because in > reality it is just a sanity check. > It does not prevent DoS because it is possible to set correctly > formatted but wrong value and force DoS. >
Forgot to ask. If possibility to set HMAC type is fine with you I can define _LAST..
Thanks.
>>> + return -EINVAL; >>> + digsig = (xvalue->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG); >>> + if (!digsig && (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE)) >>> + return -EPERM; >> According to the new ima_appraise "log" mode, commit "2faa6ef ima: >> provide 'ima_appraise=log' kernel option", "log" mode permits normal >> execution without "fixing" anything. Normal execution, here, prevents >> writing the extended attribute. > 'log' mode is also special mode for system developing and debugging. > It is beneficial to be able to 'label' target object with correct value... > > - Dmitry > > >> Mimi >> >>> + ima_reset_appraise_flags(dentry->d_inode, digsig); >>> result = 0; >>> } >>> return result; >>
| |