lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: drivers: random: Shift out-of-bounds in _mix_pool_bytes
On 10/24/2014 09:42 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:23:35AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>
>> i >> 32 may happen to be "i", but is there anything that prevents the compiler
>> from returning, let's say, 42?
>
> Not really, although gcc seems to opt for the 'sane' option and emit the
> instruction and let the arch figure out how to deal with it. Hence the
> 'fun' difference between x86 and ARM.

It's interesting how many different views on undefined behaviour there are between
kernel folks.

Everything between Ted Ts'o saying that GCC can launch nethack on oversized shifts,
to DaveM saying he will file a GCC bug if the behaviour isn't sane w.r.t to memcpy().


Thanks,
Sasha


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-24 17:41    [W:1.102 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site