Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 23 Oct 2014 23:13:04 +0200 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | Re: rcu_preempt detected stalls. |
| |
On 10/23, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > Your code, your rules. ;-)
Heh, no. I do not trust my (perverted) taste, I never-never argue with cosmetic issues ;)
Cough... and at the same time I have a small nit.
> But given this structure, why not use a for() loop replace the > "goto retry" with an inverted condition and a "return error"? > Maybe something like the following patch?
Thanks,
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
|  |