[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: rcu_preempt detected stalls.
On 10/23, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Your code, your rules. ;-)

Heh, no. I do not trust my (perverted) taste, I never-never
argue with cosmetic issues ;)

Cough... and at the same time I have a small nit.

> But given this structure, why not use a for() loop replace the
> "goto retry" with an inverted condition and a "return error"?
> Maybe something like the following patch?


Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <>

 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-23 23:41    [W:2.887 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site