lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: rcu_preempt detected stalls.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 02:40:18PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:32:32AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > > trinity-c225 R running task 13448 646 32295 0x00000000
> > > ffff880161ccfb28 0000000000000002 ffff880161ccfe10 ffff88000bf85e00
> > > 00000000001d4100 0000000000000003 ffff880161ccffd8 00000000001d4100
> > > ffff880030124680 ffff88000bf85e00 ffff880161ccffd8 0000000000000000
> > > Call Trace:
> > > [<ffffffff888368e2>] preempt_schedule_irq+0x52/0xb0
> > > [<ffffffff8883df10>] retint_kernel+0x20/0x30
> > > [<ffffffff88233d41>] ? __d_lookup_rcu+0xd1/0x1e0
> > > [<ffffffff88233dd6>] ? __d_lookup_rcu+0x166/0x1e0
> > > [<ffffffff88222f9f>] lookup_fast+0x4f/0x3d0
> > > [<ffffffff88224857>] link_path_walk+0x1a7/0x8a0
> > > [<ffffffff88224f95>] ? path_lookupat+0x45/0x7b0
> > > [<ffffffff88224fb7>] path_lookupat+0x67/0x7b0
> > > [<ffffffff880d385d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0x10
> > > [<ffffffff8883dda4>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe
> > > [<ffffffff8822572b>] filename_lookup+0x2b/0xc0
> > > [<ffffffff88229c77>] user_path_at_empty+0x67/0xc0
> > > [<ffffffff880d3dbe>] ? put_lock_stats.isra.27+0xe/0x30
> > > [<ffffffff880d42a6>] ? lock_release_holdtime.part.28+0xe6/0x160
> > > [<ffffffff880b15ad>] ? get_parent_ip+0xd/0x50
> > > [<ffffffff88229ce1>] user_path_at+0x11/0x20
> > > [<ffffffff8824fac1>] do_utimes+0xd1/0x180
> > > [<ffffffff8824fbef>] SyS_utime+0x7f/0xc0
> > > [<ffffffff8883d345>] ? tracesys+0x7e/0xe2
> > > [<ffffffff8883d3a4>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2
> >
> > This one will require more looking. But did you do something like
> > create a pair of mutually recursive symlinks or something? ;-)
>
> I'm not 100% sure, but this may have been on a box that I was running
> tests on NFS. So maybe the server had disappeared with the mount
> still active..
>
> Just a guess tbh.

Another possibility might be that the box was so overloaded that tasks
were getting preempted for 21 seconds as a matter of course, and sometimes
within RCU read-side critical sections. Or did the box have ample idle
time?

Thanx, Paul



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-23 22:01    [W:0.049 / U:12.000 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site