Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 22 Oct 2014 21:43:08 -0500 | From | Alex Thorlton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/4] Convert khugepaged to a task_work function |
| |
Please ignore! Screwed up my git send-email... Sending the proper version here in a bit...
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 09:35:02PM -0500, Alex Thorlton wrote: > Hey everyone, > > Last week, while discussing possible fixes for some unexpected/unwanted behavior > from khugepaged (see: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/8/515) several people > mentioned possibly changing changing khugepaged to work as a task_work function > instead of a kernel thread. This will give us finer grained control over the > page collapse scans, eliminate some unnecessary scans since tasks that are > relatively inactive will not be scanned often, and eliminate the unwanted > behavior described in the email thread I mentioned. > > This initial patch is fully functional, but there are quite a few areas that > will need to be polished up before it's ready to be considered for a merge. I > wanted to get this initial version out with some basic test results quickly, so > that people can give their opinions and let me know if there's anything they'd > like to see done differently (and there probably is :). I'll give details on > the code in the individual patches. > > I gathered some pretty rudimentary test data using a 48-thread NAMD simulation > pinned to a cpuset with 8 cpus and about 60g of memory. I'm checking to see if > I'm allowed to publish the input data so that others can replicate the test. In > the meantime, if somebody knows of a publicly available benchmark that stresses > khugepaged, that would be helpful. > > The only data point I gathered was the number of pages collapsed, sampled every > ten seconds, for the lifetime of the job. This one statistic gives a pretty > decent illustration of the difference in behavior between the two kernels, but I > intend to add some other counters to measure fully completed scans, failed > allocations, and possibly scans skipped due to timer constraints. > > The data for the standard kernel (with a very small patch to add the stat > counter that I used to the task_struct) is available here: > > http://oss.sgi.com/projects/memtests/pgcollapse/output-khpd > > This was a fairly recent kernel (last Tuesday). Commit ID: > 2d65a9f48fcdf7866aab6457bc707ca233e0c791. I'll send the patches I used for that > kernel as a reply to this message shortly. > > The output from the modified kernel is stored here: > > http://oss.sgi.com/projects/memtests/pgcollapse/output-pgcollapse > > The output is stored in a pretty dumb format (*really* wide). Best viewed in a > simple text editor with word wrap off, just fyi. > > Quick summary of what I found: Both kernels performed about the same when it > comes to overall runtime, my kernel was 22 seconds faster with a total runtime > of 4:13:07. Not a significant difference, but important to note that there was > no apparent performance degradation. The most interesting result is that my > kernel completed the majority of the necessary page collapses for this job in > 2:04, whereas the mainline kernel took 29:05 to get to the same point. > > Let me know what you think. Any suggestions are appreciated! > > - Alex > > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > Cc: Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com> > Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> > Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> > Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> > Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> > Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> > Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Alex Thorlton (4): > Disable khugepaged thread > Add pgcollapse controls to task_struct > Convert khugepaged scan functions to work with task_work > Add /proc files to expose per-mm pgcollapse stats > > fs/proc/base.c | 23 +++++++ > include/linux/khugepaged.h | 10 ++- > include/linux/sched.h | 16 +++++ > kernel/fork.c | 7 ++ > kernel/sched/fair.c | 18 +++++ > mm/huge_memory.c | 162 +++++++++++++++------------------------------ > 6 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-) > > -- > 1.7.12.4 >
|  |