lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 1/4] mm: memcontrol: uncharge pages on swapout
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:07:52AM +0900, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
> (2014/10/21 0:22), Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > mem_cgroup_swapout() is called with exclusive access to the page at
> > the end of the page's lifetime. Instead of clearing the PCG_MEMSW
> > flag and deferring the uncharge, just do it right away. This allows
> > follow-up patches to simplify the uncharge code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> > ---
> > mm/memcontrol.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index bea3fddb3372..7709f17347f3 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -5799,6 +5799,7 @@ static void __init enable_swap_cgroup(void)
> > */
> > void mem_cgroup_swapout(struct page *page, swp_entry_t entry)
> > {
> > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> > struct page_cgroup *pc;
> > unsigned short oldid;
> >
> > @@ -5815,13 +5816,21 @@ void mem_cgroup_swapout(struct page *page, swp_entry_t entry)
> > return;
> >
> > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!(pc->flags & PCG_MEMSW), page);
> shouldn't be removed ?

It's still a legitimate check at this point. But it's removed later
in the series when PCG_MEMSW itself goes away.

> Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

Thanks!


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-21 23:21    [W:0.093 / U:0.776 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site