lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: lockdep splat in CPU hotplug
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> > Please have a look at the very first stacktrace in the dump, where lockdep
> > is trying to explain where cpu_hotplug.lock#2 has been acquired. It seems
> > to imply that cpuidle_pause() is taking cpu_hotplug.lock, but that's not
> > the case at all.
> >
> > What am I missing?
> >
>
> > -> #1 (cpu_hotplug.lock#2){+.+.+.}:
> > [<ffffffff81099fac>] lock_acquire+0xac/0x130
> > [<ffffffff815b9f2c>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5c/0x3b0
> > [<ffffffff81491892>] cpuidle_pause+0x12/0x30
> > [<ffffffff81402314>] dpm_suspend_noirq+0x44/0x340
> > [<ffffffff81402958>] dpm_suspend_end+0x38/0x80
> > [<ffffffff810a07bd>] hibernation_snapshot+0xcd/0x370
> > [<ffffffff810a1248>] hibernate+0x168/0x210
> > [<ffffffff8109e9b4>] state_store+0xe4/0xf0
> > [<ffffffff813003ef>] kobj_attr_store+0xf/0x20
> > [<ffffffff8121e9a3>] sysfs_kf_write+0x43/0x60
> > [<ffffffff8121e287>] kernfs_fop_write+0xe7/0x170
> > [<ffffffff811a7342>] vfs_write+0xb2/0x1f0
> > [<ffffffff811a7da4>] SyS_write+0x44/0xb0
> > [<ffffffff815be856>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>
> Yeah, this backtrace looks totally bogus. Unless there's some magic going on
> with grabbing the get_online_cpus here?
>
> Could you send your config. Maybe it has to do with some debug magic?

.config attached.

--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs[unhandled content-type:application/x-config]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-21 17:41    [W:0.139 / U:0.104 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site