Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 21 Oct 2014 21:10:00 +0900 | From | Masami Hiramatsu <> | Subject | Re: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ftracetest: add kprobes on ftrace testcase |
| |
(2014/10/21 20:59), Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:21:05PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >> (2014/10/20 19:52), Heiko Carstens wrote: >>> Add a kprobes on ftrace testcase. The testcase verifies that >>> - enabling and disabling function tracing works on a function which >>> already contains a dynamic kprobe >>> - adding and removing a dynamic kprobe works on a function which is >>> already enabled for function tracing >>> >> >> Looks good to me. >> >>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> >> >> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> > > Hi Masami, > > thanks! How should these two patches go upstream?
Steven, could you pick this series to your tree? I think it is better to manage ftracetest testcases in one tree.
Thank you,
-- Masami HIRAMATSU Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com
| |