Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:40:48 +0530 | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] New Mailbox framework for 3.18 | From | Jassi Brar <> |
| |
On 21 October 2014 13:13, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > On Monday 20 October 2014 15:23:38 Jassi Brar wrote: >> On 8 October 2014 11:09, Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org> wrote: >> > Hi Linus, >> > >> > A framework for Mailbox controllers and clients have been cooking for >> > more than a year now. Everybody in the CC list had been copied on >> > patchset revisions and most of them have made sounds of approval, >> > though just one concrete Reviewed-by. The patchset has also been in >> > linux-next for a couple of weeks now and no conflict has been >> > reported. The framework has the backing of at least 5 platforms, >> > though I can't say if/when they upstream their drivers (some >> > businesses have 'changed'). >> > >> Hi Linus, >> While I was speculating on the reasons why you were not merging the >> patchset - not enough Acked-Bys, you want it via asoc, my git server >> down (I am not aware) or you just forgot in the unlikely case - I >> missed the window. >> There are couple of platforms waiting for the api to get upstream and >> now I have the devs on my back. Assuming I messed up the pull request >> somehow, may I know how? > > Jassi, > > I assume a contributing factor here was that you rebased the tree > just before submission, which is always a bad sign. > > There is a small chance that Linus will still pull this for v3.18, as he > said that he'd take a few things that have been submitted in time. If > not, please rebase once more on top of v3.18-rc1 and send a pull request > to arm@kernel.org so we can put it into arm-soc for 3.19. > OK, I will. And thanks for pointing out the issue with rebasing.
Thanks Jassi
|  |