lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] perf tools: fix incorrect header string
On 2014/10/16 22:55, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:21:13AM +0800, Wang Nan escreveu:
>> On 2014/10/15 23:13, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>> Em Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:28:53AM +0800, Wang Nan escreveu:
>>>> Commit fbe96f29 (perf tools: Make perf.data more self-descriptive)
>>>> read '/proc/cpuinfo' to form cpu descriptor. For ARM, it finds
>>>> 'Processor' field. It is correct when the patch merged, but due to
>>>> commit b4b8f770 (ARM: kernel: update cpuinfo to print all online CPUs
>>>> features), the corresponding information becomes 'model name' field.
>>>>
>>>> This patch simply corrects it.
>>>
>>> It doesn't :-)
>>>
>>> It makes it work with kernels >= b4b8f770, and fail with older kernels.
>>>
>>> We need to somehow figure out where the right information is regardless
>>> of the kernel.
>>>
>>> - Arnaldo
>>>
>>
>> However it is a real problem. Look at output on arm platform at the
>> bottom of this mail, especially "cpudesc", "total memory" and "cmdline" field.
>
> Yeah, I haven't said it wasn't a problem, just that the proposed fix
> wasn't enough.
>
> - Arnaldo
>
>> By further debugging I found that the real problem resides in return value checking
>> when write header error. Please see my other patches:
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/15/612
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/15/611

So what's your opinion on these two patches?

>>
>> I think at least one of them is required.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> tools/perf/perf-sys.h | 2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/perf-sys.h b/tools/perf/perf-sys.h
>>>> index 937e432..4293970 100644
>>>> --- a/tools/perf/perf-sys.h
>>>> +++ b/tools/perf/perf-sys.h
>>>> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@
>>>> #define mb() ((void(*)(void))0xffff0fa0)()
>>>> #define wmb() ((void(*)(void))0xffff0fa0)()
>>>> #define rmb() ((void(*)(void))0xffff0fa0)()
>>>> -#define CPUINFO_PROC "Processor"
>>>> +#define CPUINFO_PROC "model name"
>>>> #endif
>>>>
>>>> #ifdef __aarch64__
>>>> --
>>>> 1.8.4
>>
>>
>>
>> bash-4.2# perf record ls
>> ...
>> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
>> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.001 MB perf.data (~36 samples) ]
>> bash-4.2# perf report --stdio --header
>> Error:
>> The perf.data file has no samples!
>> # ========
>> # captured on: Fri Sep 12 10:09:10 2014
>> # hostname : arma15el
>> # os release : 3.17.0+
>> # perf version : 3.10.53
>> # arch : armv7l
>> # nrcpus online : 4
>> # nrcpus avail : 1
>> # cpudesc : (null)
>> # total memory : 0 kB
>> # cmdline :
>> # event : name = cycles, type = 0, config = 0x0, config1 = 0x0, config2 = 0x0, excl_usr = 0, excl_kern = 0, excl_host = 0, excl_guest = 1, precise_ip = 0
>> # pmu mappings: not available
>> # ========
>> #
>>
>>




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-21 06:01    [W:0.450 / U:0.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site