lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/6] ARM: meson: add meson8 machine definition
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 11:24:54AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 October 2014 23:29:41 Beniamino Galvani wrote:
> >
> > +static const char * const m8_common_board_compat[] = {
> > + "amlogic,meson8",
> > + NULL,
> > +};
> > +
> > DT_MACHINE_START(AML8726_MX, "Amlogic Meson6 platform")
> > .dt_compat = m6_common_board_compat,
> > MACHINE_END
> >
> > +DT_MACHINE_START(MESON8, "Amlogic Meson8 platform")
> > + .dt_compat = m8_common_board_compat,
> > +MACHINE_END
> >
>
> I'd just add the meson8 string to the m6_common_board_compat list and
> rename it.

From what I've seen so far the two families are very similar and share
most of the IP cores, so a unique DT machine is a good idea.

Does the MACH_MESON8 Kconfig symbol still make sense or can I drop it
and rename MACH_MESON6 to MACH_MESON?

Beniamino



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-02 19:41    [W:0.281 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site