lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] SELinux list corruption fix for 3.18
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > No, the log is correct (the log always is, the back-merges can cause
> > the trivial *diff* to be broken).
>
> To add some details: the commits in there are
>
> f6ed66087648 Merge branch 'stable-3.18' of
> git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/selinux into f
> 7c66bdc72bc3 selinux: fix inode security list corruption
> e7387395a07d selinux: normalize audit log formatting
> 8497b78ecc9d selinux: cleanup error reporting in selinux_nlmsg_perm()
> 6eb1ddc6bd3f selinux: make the netif cache namespace aware
> 5e29532fed21 selinux: register nf hooks with single nf_register_hooks call
> 82341ad9b962 selinux: fix a problem with IPv6 traffic denials in
> selinux_ip_postroute()
> 04e8d6ab1fa6 selinux: Permit bounded transitions under NO_NEW_PRIVS or NOSUID.
>
> and all but the list corruption fix seem to just be duplicate commits
> of things I have already gotten elsewhere. Somebody cherry-picking
> commits and duplicating them?
>

Yep, I also already have these other changes under different commit IDs:

commit 7b0d0b40cd78cadb525df760ee4cac151533c2b5
Author: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Date: Mon Aug 4 13:36:49 2014 -0400

selinux: Permit bounded transitions under NO_NEW_PRIVS or NOSUID.


Paul: do you have the above commit ID in your tree?

> So there are more things rotten in this tree than a back-merge.



--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-15 10:41    [W:0.099 / U:0.276 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site