lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] input: alps: Reset mouse before identifying it
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 07:57:37PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 October 2014 19:43:15 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 02:53:11PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 14 October 2014 08:08:34 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 11:47:59AM +0200, Hans de Goede
> wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for working on this!
> > > > >
> > > > > On 10/03/2014 11:43 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > > > On some systems after starting computer function
> > > > > > alps_identify() does not detect dual ALPS
> > > > > > touchpad+trackstick device correctly and detect only
> > > > > > touchpad.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Resetting ALPS device before identifiying it fixing
> > > > > > this problem and both parts touchpad and trackstick
> > > > > > are detected.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
> > > > > > Tested-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Looks good and seems sensible:
> > > > >
> > > > > Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> > > >
> > > > *sigh* I am not really happy about this, as we making boot
> > > > longer and longer for people without ALPS touchpads. It
> > > > would be better if we only reset the mouse when we knew
> > > > we are dealing with ALPS, and even better if we only
> > > > reset it when we suspected that we missed trackstick. Any
> > > > chance of doing this?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Dmitry, problem is that function check which detecting
> > > trackstick does not working when I start my laptop from
> > > power-off state and do not reset PS/2 device. But detecting
> > > ALPS touchpad looks like working. So if do not like this
> > > idea, what about doing something like this in alps_dectect
> > > function?
> > >
> > > int alps_detect(...)
> > > {
> > > ...
> > > /* detect if device is ALPS */
> > > if (alps_identify(...) < 0)
> > > return -1;
> > > /* now we know that device is ALPS */
> > > if (!(flags & ALPS_DUALPOINT)) {
> > > /* reset it and identify again, maybe there is trackstick */
> > > psmouse_reset(...);
> > > alps_identify(...);
> > > }
> > > ...
> > > }
> > >
> > > It will does not affect non ALPS devices (because first
> > > identify call will fail), but will affect ALPS devices
> > > without trackstick (because identify will be called twice
> > > and reset too).
> >
> > I think this is a step in right direction. Do you know what
> > exactly fails in alps_identify() on your box if you do not
> > call psmouse_reset?
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> Yes, I know. It is failing in alps_probe_trackstick_v3(). It
> calls alps_command_mode_read_reg(...) and it returns 0 which
> means trackstick is not there.

OK, so can we try sticking psmouse_reset() there? This will limit the
exposure of the new delay.

Thanks.

--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-15 20:41    [W:0.138 / U:0.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site